Kanoro
New Member
Hey I know that many people have posted threads about this before but I'm just extremely confused about WHY I load so ridiculously slow. A 1 vs 1, at Junk Flea, with all of the settings on the minimum takes me 2 minutes MINIMUM. An average game takes me about 2:45 - 3:30. Here are my system specs:
Manufacturer: Compaq Presario 061
Processor: AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3200+, MMX, 3DNow, ~1.8GHz
Memory: 446MB RAM
Hard Drive: 72 GB
Video Card: ATI RADEON XPRESS 200 Series
Internet Connection: High Speed Cable
I am well aware that my system specs are probably the crappiest ones that anybody has ever seen BUT. Here are the minimum required settings for Combat Arms.
Windows 2000 or XP
• Pentium 3, 1 GHz
• 256Mb RAM
• GeForce 2 MX or equivalent video card
• DirectX 9.0C
• 2Gb Hard Disk Space
• 128 kb/s Internet Connection
Here's the thing. I've played Warrock. It isn't as graphicly demanding as Combat Arms but the graphics do come pretty close. Aside from the graphics, The maps are humungous, some taking 5 minutes to cross. That and the fact that It has vehicles and twice as many players per game as Combat Arms. Also another game called Parabellum has AMAZING graphics. I downloaded it closed beta and I only got 9 fps literally BUT. It only took me 10 secs to load the map. So my question is, despite all those factors WHY DOES COMBAT ARMS TAKE SO LONG TO LOAD? Why do warrock and parabellum load in 10 secs average? Also I'd like you to know that I defragged, virus scanned, cleaned registry, used gamebooster and all that good stuff. Combat Arms still takes 2 mins average to load while Parabellum and WarRock barely take 10 seconds.
Manufacturer: Compaq Presario 061
Processor: AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3200+, MMX, 3DNow, ~1.8GHz
Memory: 446MB RAM
Hard Drive: 72 GB
Video Card: ATI RADEON XPRESS 200 Series
Internet Connection: High Speed Cable
I am well aware that my system specs are probably the crappiest ones that anybody has ever seen BUT. Here are the minimum required settings for Combat Arms.
Windows 2000 or XP
• Pentium 3, 1 GHz
• 256Mb RAM
• GeForce 2 MX or equivalent video card
• DirectX 9.0C
• 2Gb Hard Disk Space
• 128 kb/s Internet Connection
Here's the thing. I've played Warrock. It isn't as graphicly demanding as Combat Arms but the graphics do come pretty close. Aside from the graphics, The maps are humungous, some taking 5 minutes to cross. That and the fact that It has vehicles and twice as many players per game as Combat Arms. Also another game called Parabellum has AMAZING graphics. I downloaded it closed beta and I only got 9 fps literally BUT. It only took me 10 secs to load the map. So my question is, despite all those factors WHY DOES COMBAT ARMS TAKE SO LONG TO LOAD? Why do warrock and parabellum load in 10 secs average? Also I'd like you to know that I defragged, virus scanned, cleaned registry, used gamebooster and all that good stuff. Combat Arms still takes 2 mins average to load while Parabellum and WarRock barely take 10 seconds.