Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Come and join our gamer community by
registering for free here
First Person Shooters & Third Person Shooters
Combat Arms
Combat Arms Clan Recruitment
Fear the Lord Christian Clan
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PLaTiNuM428" data-source="post: 96246" data-attributes="member: 4657"><p>Okay, you would like proof that evolution is a sham? Hmmm, what would that take? I'm guessing it would take molecular biology advances to undermine Darwin's very premise for his theory to begin with plus some biochemistry and genetics updates . Also, I think it would take Charles Darwin himself testifying against it.</p><p>OMG! I have both of those! Read on:</p><p></p><p>Darwin's Theory of Evolution is a theory in crisis in light of the tremendous advances we've made in molecular biology, biochemistry and genetics over the past fifty years. We now know that there are in fact tens of thousands of irreducibly complex systems on the cellular level. Specified complexity pervades the microscopic biological world. Molecular biologist Michael Denton wrote, "Although the tiniest bacterial cells are incredibly small, weighing less than 10-12 grams, each is in effect a veritable micro-miniaturized factory containing thousands of exquisitely designed pieces of intricate molecular machinery, made up altogether of one hundred thousand million atoms, far more complicated than any machinery built by man and absolutely without parallel in the non-living world."</p><p></p><p>And we don't need a microscope to observe irreducible complexity. The eye, the ear and the heart are all examples of irreducible complexity, though they were not recognized as such in Darwin's day. Nevertheless, (Here's the confession)<strong>Darwin confessed, "To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess,<u> absurd in the highest degree</u>." </strong></p><p>(Here's the source)</p><p>Charles Darwin, "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life," 1859, p. 155. </p><p></p><p>Okay, so to make us even please get God, Jesus, or the Holy Spirit on record saying it is "absurd in the highest degree" (*laugh*). I'll settle for a pope, archbishop, or even just a bishop. Maybe a long-term priest? </p><p></p><p>You know the funny thing... the more we learn, the more people tend to push the god-less theory. But then, once we reach a point, people start going back to God. They never stop learning, they just start to see it as a revelation of God's creation. That's also why more and more scientists are backing away from evolution and we have a lot of them turning to Christianity, hence the science and religion movement that is underway.</p><p></p><p>Also, Darwin's Theory was proposed as a slow and subtle process. That's not true. Not the way it works at all. It goes in leaps. There will be no change for a long time, and then boom! big change. So, again, the theory's premise has been proven false by science.</p><p></p><p>As for showing you salvation. I'll start a new post, don't want to scare people away with too long a post.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PLaTiNuM428, post: 96246, member: 4657"] Okay, you would like proof that evolution is a sham? Hmmm, what would that take? I'm guessing it would take molecular biology advances to undermine Darwin's very premise for his theory to begin with plus some biochemistry and genetics updates . Also, I think it would take Charles Darwin himself testifying against it. OMG! I have both of those! Read on: Darwin's Theory of Evolution is a theory in crisis in light of the tremendous advances we've made in molecular biology, biochemistry and genetics over the past fifty years. We now know that there are in fact tens of thousands of irreducibly complex systems on the cellular level. Specified complexity pervades the microscopic biological world. Molecular biologist Michael Denton wrote, "Although the tiniest bacterial cells are incredibly small, weighing less than 10-12 grams, each is in effect a veritable micro-miniaturized factory containing thousands of exquisitely designed pieces of intricate molecular machinery, made up altogether of one hundred thousand million atoms, far more complicated than any machinery built by man and absolutely without parallel in the non-living world." And we don't need a microscope to observe irreducible complexity. The eye, the ear and the heart are all examples of irreducible complexity, though they were not recognized as such in Darwin's day. Nevertheless, (Here's the confession)[B]Darwin confessed, "To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess,[U] absurd in the highest degree[/U]." [/B] (Here's the source) Charles Darwin, "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life," 1859, p. 155. Okay, so to make us even please get God, Jesus, or the Holy Spirit on record saying it is "absurd in the highest degree" (*laugh*). I'll settle for a pope, archbishop, or even just a bishop. Maybe a long-term priest? You know the funny thing... the more we learn, the more people tend to push the god-less theory. But then, once we reach a point, people start going back to God. They never stop learning, they just start to see it as a revelation of God's creation. That's also why more and more scientists are backing away from evolution and we have a lot of them turning to Christianity, hence the science and religion movement that is underway. Also, Darwin's Theory was proposed as a slow and subtle process. That's not true. Not the way it works at all. It goes in leaps. There will be no change for a long time, and then boom! big change. So, again, the theory's premise has been proven false by science. As for showing you salvation. I'll start a new post, don't want to scare people away with too long a post. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
First Person Shooters & Third Person Shooters
Combat Arms
Combat Arms Clan Recruitment
Fear the Lord Christian Clan
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top