Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Come and join our gamer community by
registering for free here
First Person Shooters & Third Person Shooters
Call of Duty
Modern Warfare 3
MW3 must have guns!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="spuznick242" data-source="post: 218637" data-attributes="member: 4778"><p><span style="color: DarkOrange"></span></p><p><span style="color: DarkOrange"></span></p><p><span style="color: DarkOrange">No games are good enough, such as BF2, they did something never done before. COD4 did something never done before by fallowing characters and making a great storyline with even better maps, I was expecting more from MW2 but its not anywhere near. I expect that when a company releases a second game that it will be better than the first and when its not its a let down. Its like releasing a second version of Toyota's cars/trucks after knowing about the gas pedal problem but not fixing it. They should have looked back at the first one and thought about what could they have impoved, like setting it more in the future is a good one, keeping some characters, but thats all they kept, and they didnt improve anything but the guns, which really wasnt an improvement, it added guns and extras to add on the guns to make some combinations over powered than others which every noob in the game just ran around with. Its the the M32 in CA, anyone can be good with it, which is why its nooby, MW2 has several M32's. Its just not nearly as good as the first which is why its a let down because whats the point of having a second one if its not as good. I get the action is good, but even still, it needs work. </span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="spuznick242, post: 218637, member: 4778"] [COLOR="DarkOrange"] No games are good enough, such as BF2, they did something never done before. COD4 did something never done before by fallowing characters and making a great storyline with even better maps, I was expecting more from MW2 but its not anywhere near. I expect that when a company releases a second game that it will be better than the first and when its not its a let down. Its like releasing a second version of Toyota's cars/trucks after knowing about the gas pedal problem but not fixing it. They should have looked back at the first one and thought about what could they have impoved, like setting it more in the future is a good one, keeping some characters, but thats all they kept, and they didnt improve anything but the guns, which really wasnt an improvement, it added guns and extras to add on the guns to make some combinations over powered than others which every noob in the game just ran around with. Its the the M32 in CA, anyone can be good with it, which is why its nooby, MW2 has several M32's. Its just not nearly as good as the first which is why its a let down because whats the point of having a second one if its not as good. I get the action is good, but even still, it needs work. [/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
First Person Shooters & Third Person Shooters
Call of Duty
Modern Warfare 3
MW3 must have guns!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top